CoverCraft — AI cover letters that read human
CoverCraft / Cover Letter Critique

Cover Letter Critique: 7 Mistakes That Get Your Letter Ignored

You sent dozens of applications and heard nothing back. The letter is usually the reason. Below are the seven mistakes an AI critic flags most often in real cover letters — each with the bad version, why it kills your application, and the exact fix. At the end, get your own letter checked the same way.

A real critique — a template-grade letter, scored as-is
25/100
0 strong5 weak6 weakest

"This is a template-grade letter with zero company-specific detail and no quantified proof of impact, so it will lose to almost any candidate who names projects, metrics, and the employer."

1. The template opener

Bad: "I am writing to express my keen interest in the Software Engineer position at your company."

Why it kills your application: Recruiters see this exact opener hundreds of times a day. It says nothing about you, the role, or the company — it signals a mass-applied letter and gets skimmed past in seconds.

Fix: Open with a 2-sentence hook: name the exact role and one concrete reason you are applying (a product feature, a blog post, a mission point), plus one line of proof of your strongest match.

2. Banned clichés — "passionate", "excited", "eager"

Bad: "I am a passionate software developer with a strong background in building web applications."

Why it kills your application: Self-praise with no evidence. Every applicant claims passion; the adjective adds nothing the recruiter can verify, and it is the single most common tell of an AI-generated or template letter.

Fix: Cut the adjective and show the work instead: name one project, one tool, and one result. "I rebuilt our dashboard pipeline in SQL and cut reporting time from 3 days to 4 hours" beats "passionate developer" every time.

3. Empty claims — "perfect fit", "significant contribution"

Bad: "I believe my skills and experience make me a perfect fit for this role."

Why it kills your application: It is an assertion with no proof, and it could appear in any application to any company. Recruiters mentally delete sentences like this.

Fix: Replace it with the closest matching evidence: a bullet that mirrors a requirement in the job ad — the tool, the scale, the outcome.

4. An anonymized employer — "a technology company"

Bad: "In my previous role at a technology company, I was responsible for developing and maintaining various software projects."

Why it kills your application: Hiding the employer reads as if you are ashamed of it or have something to hide. Vague duties ("various software projects") compound the vagueness.

Fix: Name the employer and one specific system you worked on. If confidentiality is a real concern, name the industry and product type — "at a logistics startup, the delivery-tracking platform" — and quantify the scope.

5. Generic teamwork — "cross-functional teams"

Bad: "I worked closely with cross-functional teams to deliver high-quality products."

Why it kills your application: This sentence could describe any employee at any company. Without specifics, it adds zero information.

Fix: Say what the team shipped and your role in it: "I owned the analytics module in a 6-person squad that launched a mobile app to 40,000 users."

6. Zero numbers — the kiss of death

Bad: "I have extensive experience with JavaScript, Python, and cloud technologies."

Why it kills your application: A skills list with no scale, no outcome, and no responsibility attached tells the recruiter nothing about impact. In a stack of similar applicants, the one with numbers wins.

Fix: Attach a metric to every skill: users served, latency cut, revenue moved, uptime kept. If you do not have a number, use the size of the system or the team.

7. The passive closing — "I look forward to hearing from you"

Bad: "Thank you for considering my application. I look forward to hearing from you soon."

Why it kills your application: It is boilerplate with no call to action. The letter ends exactly like hundreds of others, so nothing makes the recruiter want to reply.

Fix: Close with a confident, specific call to action: offer to walk through a relevant project and state your availability — name the thing you will show them, not a generic thanks.

Get your own letter checked the same way

Paste your draft into CoverCraft, and the AI critic scores it 0-100, flags every weak and weakest sentence with the reason, and tells you exactly what to fix — including the clichés below. No account needed, free every day.

Paste your letter and get your own critiqueFree every day — a score, sentence-level fixes, and the exact words to replace

Frequently asked questions

How does the CoverCraft critique work?

Paste your draft letter, and the AI critic reads it paragraph by paragraph: a score from 0 to 100, every weak and weakest sentence flagged with a one-line reason, and a concrete fix for each. Pro adds a full rewritten version of your letter.

Is the critique free?

Yes — free every day within the daily free quota, with no account or credit card required. Upgrade to Pro for unlimited checks plus a complete rewrite of your letter.

What is the difference between critique and generation?

Critique checks a letter you already wrote and tells you what is wrong. Generation writes a new letter from three lines about your experience. Use critique when you have a draft; use generation when you are starting from zero. Pro lets you do both and rewrite.

More examples: Data Analyst · No Experience · Internship · Teacher · Nurse · Customer Service · Software Engineer · Marketing Manager · Accountant · Administrative Assistant · Project Manager · Sales Representative